• Users Online: 48
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 92-99

Prevalence and determinants of spacing contraceptive use among rural married women of Jammu, India


1 Centre for Public Health and Healthcare Administration, Eternal University, Baru Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, India
2 Department of Informatics, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Submission02-Nov-2020
Date of Acceptance21-May-2021
Date of Web Publication24-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Priyanka Khuda
Centre for Public Health and Healthcare Administration, Eternal University, Baru Sahib, Himachal Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijcfm.ijcfm_128_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: Promotion of family planning, especially the use of contraceptive methods is essential to secure the well-being and development of society. Despite rise in the temporary contraceptive usage over the years, the implementation of the spacing method has been indicated lower in rural as compared to the urban areas of India. This study aims to find out the prevalence and determinants of current use of spacing contraceptives among married rural women of Jammu district, Jammu and Kashmir.
Material and Methods: A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2018 among married rural women. The survey was conducted house to house, and data were collected with the help of a questionnaire and BG Prasad Scale. Multi-stage sampling procedure was adopted to select the participants. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify the factors associated with the current use of spacing contraceptive methods.
Results: The current use of spacing contraceptive among married women was found to be 16.4%. The male condom was the most used method (55.7%) as well as most preferred contraceptive (46.8%). Lack of knowledge was reported as the main reason for not using contraceptive method. The current use of spacing contraceptive method was significantly higher among the upper socioeconomic status (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.37(1.06–5.29), women with higher education (AOR ) 5.04 (0.68–37.18), living in nuclear family (AOR 1.90; CI: 1.01–3.60), with 2 or more surviving children (AOR ) 2.45 (1.27–4.73), and living near health center (AOR) 1.69 (0.91–3.14).
Conclusion: Effective targeted programs along with conduction of more field researches that give scientific information should be implemented to achieve the desired goal of contraceptive usage in the rural area among married couples.

Keywords: Family planning, married women, spacing contraceptives, temporary, trends


How to cite this article:
Khuda P, Gupta NL, Palaka N, Kaur G. Prevalence and determinants of spacing contraceptive use among rural married women of Jammu, India. Indian J Community Fam Med 2021;7:92-9

How to cite this URL:
Khuda P, Gupta NL, Palaka N, Kaur G. Prevalence and determinants of spacing contraceptive use among rural married women of Jammu, India. Indian J Community Fam Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 May 24];7:92-9. Available from: https://www.ijcfm.org/text.asp?2021/7/2/92/333658




  Introduction Top


Contraceptive use is helpful for a couple to have the desired number of children by maintaining interpregnancy intervals. It is a pivotal dimension of overall family and child well-being and female reproductive health as it prevents unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or sexually transmitted diseases. It has benefited women by creating opportunities, reducing poverty, improvement of economic security for families, communities, and countries.[1] Despite five decades of government-initiated family welfare program, the increase in the use of temporary contraceptives in India has been slow from 5.5% in 1992–92 to 11.4% in 2015–16, as shown in [Table 1]. The use of spacing method among married women varied widely by state ranging from 0.6% in Andhra Pradesh, 1.2% in Telangana, 28.9% in Tripura, to 36.3% in Chandigarh.[2] There is wide variations and diversities in the demographic, cultural, and socioeconomic context within the states of the country.[3] The use of contraceptive methods in the majority of Indian states has been reported to be attributable to age,[4],[5] residence,[4] wealth status,[5],[6] type of family,[6] religion,[4],[5] education of woman,[5],[6] occupation of woman,[5] education of husband,[7] occupation of husband,[7] number of living children,[4],[5],[6] and distance from health center.[7]
Table 1: Contraceptive use by residence, Jammu and Kashmir and India

Click here to view


In Jammu and Kashmir, the proportion of couple protection by spacing methods was stagnant from 10.0% during 1992–93 to 11.1% during 1998-99 an which increased to 15.9% was observed during 2005–2006 and an increase of 21.3% during 2015–2016. In case of contraceptive methods, the usage has declined from 49.4% in 1992–1993 to 49.1% in 1998–1999. An increase to 52.6% has taken place in the period 2005–2006 to 57.1% during 2015–2016, as shown in [Table 1].

According to the district level household survey, the past trends of the use of spacing method in Jammu district have decreased from 55.7% in 2002–2004 to 16.5% in 2007–2008. The use of any contraceptive method (73.2% to 59.5%), any modern method (69.7% to 51.3%) has also decreased during 2002–2008, any traditional method (3.5%–8.0%) has only increased from 2002 to 2008, as shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Contraceptive use in Jammu district and J and K state, India

Click here to view


In Jammu and Kashmir slow increase in spacing contraceptive use over the years, and the total fertility rate (2.2 per woman) in a rural area is slightly above the replacement fertility level (2.1 per woman) have been major concerns. There is also the issues of poor use of the spacing method in the rural areas (19.9%) compared to urban (25.0%) and the unmet need for the spacing method is 4.2% in urban and 6.4% in the rural area of Jammu and Kashmir.[8]

As of now, there has been a dearth of research studies done on current spacing contraceptive use in rural Jammu and Kashmir. Therefore, this study was conducted to find the prevalence of the current use of a spacing contraceptive method and its determinants among married women in the disturbed rural area (Marh, Bhalwal, R S Pura and Bishnah) of Jammu, India.[9],[10]


  Material and Methods Top


Jammu province, the winter capital of Jammu and Kashmir State of India which is bordered by Udhampur district in the north and northeast, Kathua district in the east and southeast, by Pakistan in West and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir in the Northwest. A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2018 in the rural area of Jammu district, one of the 10 districts of this province in India. It has eight community development blocks, and half of the population lives in the rural areas of the district with majority of the people engaged in agriculture activities and following Hindu religion. There are 74 primary health centers in the district that are owned by the government.[11]

The sample size was calculated on the infinite population of the study using Cochran's Formula:[12] n = Z2p (1 − p)/e2. Using P = 0.5 and d=5% . Adding 10% of non-response, total sample size was calculated to be 422.

The list of married women (18–49 years) of rural area of Jammu district was first obtained from the concerned health authorities. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the women who were willing to participate and who had or had not child/children were included in the study. Unmarried, widow, or divorced persons were excluded from the study. A multistage sampling technique was used to identify the study participants. First, four blocks out of the 8 in rural Jammu were selected using a simple random sampling method. From the 4 selected blocks, 94 subcenters were identified, out of which 24 subcenters were selected by the systematic random sampling technique. Finally, a sample of 422 was selected using a proportionate sampling technique from the number of participants living in these 24 selected subcenters. In case of presence of more than one married couple in a household, only one married couple were taken for the study using the lottery method [Supplementary File 1].



The survey was conducted house to house, and data were collected with the help of a structured interview schedule consisting of three sections, Section A, B, and C. Section A included questions to elicit information regarding sociodemographic variables. For the classification of socioeconomic status (SES) of the study participants, Modified BG Prasad scale[13] was used. Section B included questions to elicit information regarding contraceptives (knowledge, practice, and behavior). Section C included question to elicit information regarding barriers to contraceptive use. Collected data were verified and coded daily after completing the field activities; data entry and analysis were done in SPSS (Statistical Package for the social sciences) Version 23; Released in 2015, IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA. The descriptive analysis such as percentages and measure of central tendency were used. Bivariate technique cross-tabulation was used for understanding, differential levels of the use of spacing contraceptive method among respondents by different variables. Bivariate analysis was performed to see the associations along with their odds ratios (OR) at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and P values were obtained to identify the associations. All variables that were found to be significant at the bivariate level (P < 0.05) were entered into the multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model to test the strength of the association.

The dependent variable had two categories using spacing method and not using spacing methods. Since the focus was on spacing methods, sterilization cases (n = 19) were dropped from the analysis. The independent variables considered were the age of women, residence, SES, type of family, education of woman, occupation of woman, education of husband, occupation of husband, number of living children, and distance from the health center.

The study was done after taking approval from the Ethical Committee of the Eternal University, Baru Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, India, and the Directorate of Health Services/Block Medical Officers, Jammu. Informed verbal consent was obtained for voluntary participation from individuals before the administration of the questionnaire. The confidentiality of the participants was maintained, and data were used only for the research purpose.


  Results Top


A total of 422 married women were interviewed during the course of this study. Half of the study population were in the age group of 26–35 years. The 82.2% participants had secondary education and 89.6% were homemakers. The majority (84.4%) of the husbands of the participants had secondary level of education, and almost all (96.2%) were working. The majority were Hindu (89.8%), belonged to a joint family (77.5%), less than one-third (31.3%) were from the upper class, and 41% respondents had 2 children. More than half of participants (59.2%) were residing within 3 km area of the health center [Table 3].
Table 3: Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of respondents (n=422)

Click here to view


In this study, the majority reported that they have heard about any contraceptive methods. The male condom (97.2%) was the main contraceptive method heard by the participants, followed by female sterilization (82.9%); Out of these, 77.2% reported mass media & 42.15 reported health personnel as the main source of information on any contraceptive method. Only about one-fifth (20.8%) were using any contraceptive method at the time of the interview. Out of those who were using, 16.4% were relying on spacing method and 4.5% had permanent sterilization. Among women who were involved in temporary contraceptive method, the male condom was the most used method (55.7%), followed by the oral pill (13.6%). Among the nonusers of contraceptive method, less than one-third (31.7%) gave the reason of not using that they did not know about any contraceptive method and about one-fourth (24.2%) were currently pregnant/breastfeeding their child. More than two-fifth of them wanted to use contraceptive in future. Among married women reporting future use for contraceptive method, the most preferred method was male condom (46.8%) and female sterilization (41.6%). Among the respondents, who did not want to use any method in future, 46% said that they did not know about the contraceptive method while 26.5% gave the reason of fear of infection/side effects [Table 4].
Table 4: Patterns of contraceptive use, awareness, sources of among study sample population Jammu distric

Click here to view


[Table 5] revealed the use of temporary contraceptive methods among participants; the various methods varied with age. Less than one-third (30.3%) participants using the spacing method were in the age of ≥36 years with mean age was 29.6 ± 7.04 years. The respondents (17.7%) using spacing contraceptive methods were Hindu, 29.8% were from nuclear family, and 28.3% belonged to the upper class. Among the contraceptive user for spacing, 33.3% had higher education, 27.0% were working and 28.8% had two children, and 20.6% of users were living ≤3 km far from the health center.
Table 5: Differentials and determinants of spacing methods of contraceptive use among the study population according to select characteristics, Jammu district

Click here to view


In unadjusted odds ratio, age of women [OR: 4.54 (2.01 to 10.23)], type of family [OR 2.64 (1.50 to 4.66)], SES (adjusted odds ratio [OR: 3.77 (1.95 to 7.27)] education of women [OR 5.33 (1.35 to 21.01)], education of husband [OR 4.66 (1.15 to 18.79)], number of living children [OR 2.60 (1.43 to 4.71)], and distance from health center [OR 1.88 (1.07 to 3.30)] were found to be significantly associated with spacing contraceptive method use in bivariate analysis, as shown in [Table 5].

Taking into account the influence of all other covariates simultaneously, multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify the independent predictors for current use of the spacing contraceptive. These included age of women, education of women, education of husband, SES, number of living children, type of family and distance from health center with current use of spacing methods, except religion and occupation of women and husband.

The results revealed five significant predictors for the current use of spacing contraceptive methods: nuclear family [OR 1.90 (1.01 to 3.60)], upper class in SES [OR 2.37 (1.06 to 5.29)], more than secondary educated women [OR 5.04 (0.68 to 37.18)], ≤3 km distance form health center [OR 1.69 (0.91 to 3.14)], and having two or more living children [OR 2.45 (1.27 to 4.73]. As such, women living in the nuclear family, as well as belonging to upper class, were more likely to use temporary contraceptive method as compared to other classes. Besides lesser, the distance from the health center, higher the chance of adopting a spacing method, and women with higher education were more likely to use spacing method. Finally, the number of living children increased, women were more likely to rely on temporary method than women having one child, as shown in [Table 5].


  Discussion Top


Although family planning program has been extensively implemented and has led to the steady increase in the prevalence of contraceptive use, with variation at different places in India, yet the progress of family planning program shows higher unmet of need in rural areas (13.7%) as compared to urban areas (8.8%) of Jammu and Kashmir.[8] The past trend of fertility rate has also declined from 3.36 to 2.2 during 1992–2016[1] and 2.1 to 1.8 during 2011–2017[14] in rural Jammu and Kashmir.

The present study showed that 16.4% of participants were currently using spacing contraceptive method. This result is almost similar to National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4 report (19.2%),[8] whereas other studies showed a higher prevalence in Ludhiana (49.5%),[15] Mangalore (51.9%),[16] and Pune (81.5%),[17] contrary to our finding. This difference might be due to variation in the awareness of the people, availability of the contraceptive methods, and the difference in the study settings to access the service or change in sociocultural beliefs over time.

In the current study, it was observed that more than two-thirds of study participants were aware of any contraceptive method, a comparable finding of the study conducted in Bangalore.[18] However, contraceptive awareness was found higher in other parts of India, i.e. from 81% to 95.2%.[19],[20],[21],[22] Some studies in Chandigarh (55.0%)[23] and Madhya Pradesh (58.0%)[24] had shown lower knowledge as compared to our findings. In the present study, the mass media (77.2%) turned out to be the main source of information regarding contraceptives, similar to the result of the studies conducted in various states of India, i.e. Karnataka,[19] Tamil Nadu,[20] Uttar Pradesh,[21] Chandigarh,[23] and Kashmir.[25] However, some studies conducted in Tamil Nadu,[26] Gujarat,[27] and Chhattisgarh[28] reported that health professional was the main source of information which was the second main source of information in our study.

The male condom (55.7%) found to be the most commonly used contraceptive in this study, similar to the study conducted in Pune[5],[17] and Chandigarh.[23]

The current study reported the main reason for the nonuse of the contraceptive method as lack of knowledge (31.7%). This finding was concordant with some studies done in Pune,[17] Chandigarh,[23] Vadodara,[29] and Jammu,[30] while others reported fear of side effects[31] and want of more children[16],[18],[21] were the main reasons for nonuse of the contraceptive method.

In the current study, the most preferred contraceptive for future was condom (46.8%), which got support from the finding of NFHS[8] report. Whereas, studies conducted in Maharashtra[31] and Jammu[32] revealed that female sterilization was the most commonly preferred method for future use. Moreover, a study from Karnataka[33] showed that oral pill found out to be the most preferred method for future use.

In the multivariate analysis, it was found that there was a highly significant association between temporary contraceptive usage and number of living children. Similar findings were also supported by the study done in Mangalore where it was found to be higher in women having two or more children (93.9%) than women having one children (69.6%).[16] Similarly, a study done in Pune showed the significant association between the number of children and the use of temporary contraceptive methods.[17]

A highly significant association was found between higher income class and use of temporary contraceptives. Two studies have also found the similar findings where the temporary methods were directly associated with SES of the respondents. The use of temporary contraceptive was 66.1%[16] and 90.5%[17] among higher income group than low income group.

There was a significant association found between the education of woman and the use of temporary methods of contraception. The women who attained higher levels of education were practicing temporary contraceptives more than woman with less and no education. This findings was consistent with earlier conducted study in Mangalore where the use of temporary methods in the women of higher education were significantly higher (100%) than illiterate (23.8%).[16]

Logistic regression analysis revealed that married women living in the nuclear family, belonging to high SES, more than secondary educated women, residing at ≤3 km distance from health center and having two or more living children were more likely to use temporary contraceptive methods. Married women from the nuclear family are relatively free to talk on sex issues with husband, than the women residing in joint family where they might feel ashamed of or fear to discuss the same and also find less time with husband due to multiple tasks for many people in the family. Hence, women from nuclear family are more likely to use contraceptive than women of joint family. Similarly, women with higher education and belonging to upper class income state are more likely to do the same with more knowledge and exposure to discussion on family planning and latest developmental issues as they may feel pride in experimenting in more free time than woman of poor family and less education. Those staying near the health center get more opportunity to health information than those staying far away and hence are more likely to use more contraceptive.

Strength and limitations

It was a community-based study covering a difficult geographical area. Although the sample size was adequate, the large population of the area could have been covered. Design effect was not used, even though multistage sampling was applied.


  Conclusion Top


Despite India being the first nation in the world to launch family planning program in 1952, it has still not attained the desired level of temporary contraception usage in certain parts of India. J and K is a declared difficult area under the Indian Act[10] and this study focused on married women of rural area of Jammu and found temporary contraceptive usage prevalence with its determinants. Only one eighth of the married women of the rural Jammu were currently using temporary contraceptive. The mass media was reported to be the main source of information followed by health personnel regarding contraceptive use. SES, education of women, number of living children, type of family, and distance from health center were found to be strong five predictors of the use of spacing contraceptive methods. Dissemination of the scientific information through regular awareness campaigns and educational sessions regarding contraceptive use needs to be tailored to community by the devoted health-care personnel and mass media. Field researches need to enhance to unfold intricacies involved in this context to integrate new information that may emerge into the future programs to help create healthy society.

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank all the participants without whom this study could not have been possible.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Trends in Contraceptive Use Worldwide 2015 (ST/ESA/SER.A/349). New York: United Nation; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zavier F, Padmadas SS. Use of a spacing method before sterilization among couples in Kerala, India. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2000;26:29-35.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Thyagarajan S, Reji B, Viswan SP. Determinants of contraceptive usage in India. Int J Interdiscip Multidiscip Stud 2014;1:88-97.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Devi LB, Deshpande J, Gadade M. A study to assess the use of temporary contraceptive methods and problems associated among the married women from selected areas of Pune city. Int J Appl Res 2017;3:611-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gupta RK, Singh P, Gupta R, Akhtar N, Gupta C, Sharma P. Contraceptive use: Its prevalence, awareness, practices and determinants in a rural population of Northern India. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2017;6:1543-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Walvekar PR. Determinants of contraceptive use among married women residing in rural areas of Belgaum. J Med Allied Sci 2012;2:07-11.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), India, 2015-16: Jammu and Kashmir. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Jammu and Kashmir Development Report: Chapter VI Border Area Development. 366-386. Available from: https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/plans/stateplan/sdr_jandk/sdr_jkch6.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 May 02].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jammu and Kashmir Disturbed Areas Act, 1992 [Act No. 4 of 1992]. Available from: https://www.jk.gov.in ' sites ' default ' files. [Last accessed on 2021 May 02].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
District Census Handbook: Directorate of Census Operations, Jammu and Kashmir. 2011; Part XII-A: Series-02. Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/01/0121_PART_A_DCHB_JAMMU.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 May 02].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Israel GD. Determining sample size, PEOD6, Agricultural Education and Communication Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gainesville: University of Florida; 1992.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Singh T, Sharma S, Nagesh S. Socio-economic status scales updated. Int J Res Med Sci 2017;5:3264-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
System Registration Survey (SRS): India, Registrar General. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Reports.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 14].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Girdhar S, Chaudhary A, Gill P, Soni R, Sachar R. Contraceptive practices and related factors among married women in a rural area of Ludhiana. Internet J Health 2009;12:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lakshmi MM, Vyas N, Rai S. Contraceptive practices among reproductive age group of women in Justice K. S. Hegde Medical College Hospital, Mangalore. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2013;2:39-46.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ranjan S, Kaur S. An epidemiological study on the prevalence of use of temporary methods of contraception among married women. IJSR 2013;4:2207-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tejaswini D, Spandana JC, Bai S. Knowledge, attitude and practices about contraception among married reproductive women. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018;7:1431-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ramaiah R, Jayarama S. Contraceptive knowledge, attitude and practice among married women of reproductive age group in a rural area of Karnataka: A cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health 2017;4:1733-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Uma K. A study of the awareness of family planning among the rural population in Tamil Nadu. Int J Sci Eng Res 2014;5:46-50.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Jahan U, Verma K, Gupta S, Gupta R, Mahour S, Kirti N, et al. Awareness, attitude and practice of family planning methods in a tertiary care hospital, Uttar Pradesh, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:500-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Saluja N, Sharma S, Choudhary S, Gaur D, Pandey S. Contraceptive knowledge, attitude and practice among eligible couples of rural Haryana. Internet J Health 2011;12:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kaur H, Mohan P, Pathak P, Manocha A, Manocha A. Knowledge, attitude, practices and behaviour of women towards contraceptive use – A study of women attending North Indian Rural Hospital. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;1:25-30.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Kushwah B, Agrawal S. Knowledge, attitude and practice of contraception: A study from rural tertiary health care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2015;4:329-33.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hayat H, Khan PS, Bhat H, Hayat G, Hayat R. Knowledge, attitude and practice of contraception in rural Kashmir. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2013;63:410-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Nair RV, Ashok VG, Solanke PV. A study on contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age group in a rural area of Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:3147-52.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Brahmbhatt MM, Sheth JK, Balaramanamma DV. A study of knowledge, attitude and practice towards contraception among married women of reproductive age group having≤2 children residing in Vasna ward, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Healthline 2013;4:8-12.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Quereishi MJ, Mathew AK, Sinha A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning methods among the rural females of Bagbahara block Mahasamund district in Chhattisgarh State, India. Glob J Med Public Health 2017;6:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Patel SV, Patel DN, Pandit NB, Patel MV. A cross sectional study of contraceptive uses and unmet need for family planning among rural population of Vadodara. Int J Biomed Adv Res 2015;6:765-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Sahni B, Sobti S, Sharma V, Jamwal DS. A study of utilization and determinants of family welfare services in rural Jammu. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2013;2:8006-12.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Valekar SS, Pandve HT, Chawla PS, Mane AB. Assessment of unmet needs of family planning and reasons for non-use of contraceptive methods among women in reproductive age in rural community. J Community Med Health Educ 2017;7:549.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Gupta RK, Verma AK, Shora TN. Contraceptive prevalence, attitude and choice among women of reproductive age group in a rural area of Jammu, India. Public Health Res 2013;3:92-7.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sherpa SZ, Sheilini M, Nayak A. Knowledge, attitude, practice and preferences of contraceptive methods in Udupi district, Karnataka. J Family Reprod Health 2013;7:115-20.  Back to cited text no. 33
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed648    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded75    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal